1.
C N Kruse; K Bothe; R Brendel
In: IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, Bd. 8, Nr. 3, S. 683-688, 2018, ISSN: 2156-3381.
@article{Kruse2018,
title = {Comparison of Free Energy Loss Analysis and Synergistic Efficiency Gain Analysis for PERC Solar Cells},
author = {C N Kruse and K Bothe and R Brendel},
doi = {10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2802779},
issn = {2156-3381},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-05-01},
journal = {IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics},
volume = {8},
number = {3},
pages = {683-688},
abstract = {The optimization of a solar cell requires a detailed knowledge of the efficiency limiting power losses. The free energy loss analysis (FELA) and the synergistic efficiency gain analysis (SEGA) both allow for studying these power losses. We compare both approaches for industrial passivated emitter and rear solar cells. The resistive losses calculated with both approaches are in good agreement with each other. In contrast, we find deviations of more than 20% for losses because of charge carrier recombination. From an analytical description of both methods, we conclude that these deviations are caused by a shift of the maximum power point voltage in an improved cell which is not considered in the FELA. The deviation of the losses critically depends on the specific loss channel investigated. In contrast with implied front-side power gains which are usually underestimated, rear-side or absorber gains can be over or underestimated by the FELA depending on the magnitude of the power loss. These differences follow from the Fermi level splitting which is affected differently by recombination currents at different locations. For an accurate determination of the efficiency improvement potential of individual recombination loss channels, we therefore recommend to perform a SEGA.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The optimization of a solar cell requires a detailed knowledge of the efficiency limiting power losses. The free energy loss analysis (FELA) and the synergistic efficiency gain analysis (SEGA) both allow for studying these power losses. We compare both approaches for industrial passivated emitter and rear solar cells. The resistive losses calculated with both approaches are in good agreement with each other. In contrast, we find deviations of more than 20% for losses because of charge carrier recombination. From an analytical description of both methods, we conclude that these deviations are caused by a shift of the maximum power point voltage in an improved cell which is not considered in the FELA. The deviation of the losses critically depends on the specific loss channel investigated. In contrast with implied front-side power gains which are usually underestimated, rear-side or absorber gains can be over or underestimated by the FELA depending on the magnitude of the power loss. These differences follow from the Fermi level splitting which is affected differently by recombination currents at different locations. For an accurate determination of the efficiency improvement potential of individual recombination loss channels, we therefore recommend to perform a SEGA.